Programming Languages Implementation and Logic Programming : International Workshop PLILP '88, Orleans, France, May 1988 - Proceedings

ISBN 10: 3540508201 / ISBN 13: 9783540508205

Published by Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 1989

About this Item

Ships from the UK. Former library book; may include library markings. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages.

Seller Inventory # GRP77593852

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Programming Languages Implementation and Logic Programming : International Workshop PLILP '88, Orleans, France, May 1988 - Proceedings
• Publisher: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• Publication Date: 1989
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 3540508201
• ISBN 13: 9783540508205
• Binding: Soft cover
• Condition: Good
• Weight: 2.138 pounds

About this title

Synopsis

The aim of the workshop was to discuss whether research on implementation of programming languages and research on logic programming can mutually benefit from each others results. The intention was to bring together researchers from both fields, especially those working in the area of their intersection. Problems such as formal specification of compilers and syntax-based editors, program analysis and program optimization have been traditionally studied by implementors of algorithmic languages and have resulted in a number of well-established notions, formalisms and techniques. At the same time, an increasing number of people use logic programming as a way of specifying compilers or other programming environment tools, taking advantage of the relatively high level of logic programming and the growing efficiency of Prolog implementations. On the other hand, research on logic programming raises the questions of analysis of logic programs and their optimization. These are motivated primarily by compiler construction for logic programs, by studies on the methodology of logic programming and by the attempts to amalgamate logic programming and functional programming. The purpose of the workshop is to review the techniques developed in one (or both) of the fields which could also be of some help in the other one and to facilitate the transfer of expertise. It seems important to compare notions used in both fields: showing similarities between them may prevent rediscovering results already known, while studying differences may contribute to the transfer of technology.