The Resolving of Conscience, Upon This Question: Whether Upon Such a Supposition or Case, as Is Now Usually Made (the King Will Not Discharge His . Subjects May Take Arms and Resist? An

Is political power a trust, and when may a people resist it?

A 17th‑century examination of conscience, duty, and the limits of royal authority in England, The Resolving of Conscience asks readers to weigh the king’s vow to protect religion and liberty against the temptation to bend or subvert the law. This work argues that allegiance remains due, but that excuses for force must be carefully tested against scripture, reason, and established obligations.

The text surveys the premise that subjects may only take arms under narrowly defined conditions. It scrutinizes oaths, covenants, and the king’s duties to administer justice, defend privileges, and maintain a settled church. Throughout, the argument stresses seriousness of conscience and the dangers of rebellious action without clear warrant.

• Understand how the author frames the balance between obedience and the defense of rights.
• See how covenants, oaths, and the legitimacy of government are discussed in relation to resisting tyranny.
• Learn how scripture and reason are used to evaluate when force might be justified.
• Explore the historical and religious context that shaped debates on liberty and governance.

Ideal for readers of political theology, early-modern constitutional thought, and hard questions about duty, obedience, and liberty in a troubled era.