Revisiting Kant's Universal Law and Humanity Formulas

Sven Nyholm

ISBN 10: 3110401169 / ISBN 13: 9783110401165

Published by De Gruyter, 2015

About this Item

Revisiting Kant's Universal Law and Humanity Formulas | Sven Nyholm | Buch | ISSN | XII | Englisch | 2015 | De Gruyter | EAN 9783110401165 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, De Gruyter GmbH, Genthiner Str. 13, 10785 Berlin, productsafety[at]degruyterbrill[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu.

Seller Inventory # 105205470

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Revisiting Kant's Universal Law and Humanity Formulas
• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Publication Date: 2015
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 3110401169
• ISBN 13: 9783110401165
• Binding: Buch
• Condition: Neu
• Dimensions: 236W x 160H x 16D millimeters 236 millimeters width by 160 millimeters height by 16 millimeters depth
• Weight: 432 grams
• Seller catalogs:
  • Bücher

About this title

Synopsis

This book offers new readings of Kant’s “universal law” and “humanity” formulations of the categorical imperative. It shows how, on these readings, the formulas do indeed turn out being alternative statements of the same basic moral law, and in the process responds to many of the standard objections raised against Kant’s theory. Its first chapter briefly explores the ways in which Kant draws on his philosophical predecessors such as Plato (and especially Plato’s Republic) and Jean-Jacque Rousseau. The second chapter offers a new reading of the relation between the universal law and humanity formulas by relating both of these to a third formula of Kant’s, viz. the “law of nature” formula, and also to Kant’s ideas about laws in general and human nature in particular. The third chapter considers and rejects some influential recent attempts to understand Kant’s argument for the humanity formula, and offers an alternative reconstruction instead. Chapter four considers what it is to flourish as a human being in line with Kant’s basic formulas of morality, and argues that the standard readings of the humanity formula cannot properly account for its relation to Kant’s views about the highest human good.

About the Author

Sven Nyholm, University of Cologne, Germany.