Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms
Language: English
Published by University of California Press, 1991
- Softcover
- New

Seller: GoldBooks, Denver, CO, U.S.A.GoldBooks
5-star seller
AbeBooks seller since May 15, 2019
Softcover
Condition: New
US$ 40.91
US$ 5.50 shipping
Ships within U.S.A.
Quantity: 1 available
Add to basketFree 30-day returns
Item description from seller
New Copy. Customer Service Guaranteed.
Seller Inventory # 44C81_70_0520072898
- Title
- Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms
- Author
- Shrader-Frechette, K. S.
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Publication year
- 1991
- Condition
- new
- Binding
- Paperback
- Language
- English
- ISBN 10
- 0520072898
- ISBN 13
- 9780520072893
Only ten to twelve percent of Americans would voluntarily live within a mile of a nuclear plant or hazardous waste facility. But industry spokespersons claim that such risk aversion represents ignorance and paranoia, and they lament that citizen protests have delayed valuable projects and increased their costs.
Who is right? In Risk and Rationality, Kristin Shrader-Frechette argues that neither charges of irresponsible endangerment nor countercharges of scientific illiteracy frame the issues properly. She examines the debate over methodological norms for risk evaluation and finds analysts arrayed in a spectrum. Points of view extend from cultural relativists who believe that any risk can be justified (since no rational standards are ultimately possible) to naive positivists who believe that risk evaluation can be objective, neutral, and value free. Both camps, she argues, are wrong, because risk evaluation as a social process is rational and objective, even though all risk-evaluation rules are value-laden.
Shrader-Frechette defends a middle position called "scientific proceduralism." She shows why extremist views are unreliable, reveals misconceptions underlying current risk-evaluation methods and strategies, and sketches the reforms needed to set hazard assessment and risk evaluation on a publicly defensible foundation.
These reforms involve mathematical, economic, ethical, and legal procedures. They constitute a new paradigm for assessment when acceptance of public hazards is rational, recognizing that laypersons are often more rational in their evaluation of societal risks than either experts or governments have acknowledged. Such reforms would provide citizens with more influence in risk decisions and focus on mediating ethical conflicts, rather than seeking to impose the will of experts. Science, she argues, need not preclude democracy.
Who is right? In Risk and Rationality, Kristin Shrader-Frechette argues that neither charges of irresponsible endangerment nor countercharges of scientific illiteracy frame the issues properly. She examines the debate over methodological norms for risk evaluation and finds analysts arrayed in a spectrum. Points of view extend from cultural relativists who believe that any risk can be justified (since no rational standards are ultimately possible) to naive positivists who believe that risk evaluation can be objective, neutral, and value free. Both camps, she argues, are wrong, because risk evaluation as a social process is rational and objective, even though all risk-evaluation rules are value-laden.
Shrader-Frechette defends a middle position called "scientific proceduralism." She shows why extremist views are unreliable, reveals misconceptions underlying current risk-evaluation methods and strategies, and sketches the reforms needed to set hazard assessment and risk evaluation on a publicly defensible foundation.
These reforms involve mathematical, economic, ethical, and legal procedures. They constitute a new paradigm for assessment when acceptance of public hazards is rational, recognizing that laypersons are often more rational in their evaluation of societal risks than either experts or governments have acknowledged. Such reforms would provide citizens with more influence in risk decisions and focus on mediating ethical conflicts, rather than seeking to impose the will of experts. Science, she argues, need not preclude democracy.
"Synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
About the Author
Kristin Shrader-Frechette holds degrees in mathematics, physics, and philosophy and is Distinguished Graduate Research Professor at the University of South Florida. She has published five other books and edits the Oxford University Press series "Environmental Ethics and Science Policy."
"About the title" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping rates within U.S.A.
| Item | 4 to 14 business days | 3 to 8 business days |
|---|---|---|
| First item | US$ 5.50 | US$ 12.75 |
Payment methods
Store description
We are dedicated to providing customers with easy, flawless transactions and excellent books! We provide 100% customer satisfaction and are always here to answer any questions or concerns for our customers.
Specialty
Non-Fiction across all genres, FictionSeller's business information
Farm For Books Inc
1734 Bellaire Street
Denver, CO U.S.A. 80220