The Semantic Foundations of Logic Volume 1: Propositional Logics

R. L. Epstein

ISBN 10: 9401067228 / ISBN 13: 9789401067225

Published by Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands Nov 2013, 2013

About this Item

This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -This book grew out of my confusion. If logic is objective how can there be so many logics Is there one right logic, or many right ones Is there some underlying unity that connects them What is the significance of the mathematical theorems about logic which I've learned if they have no connection to our everyday reasoning The answers I propose revolve around the perception that what one pays attention to in reasoning determines which logic is appropriate. The act of abstracting from our reasoning in our usual language is the stepping stone from reasoned argument to logic. We cannot take this step alone, for we reason together: logic is reasoning which has some objective value. For you to understand my answers, or perhaps better, conjectures, I have retraced my steps: from the concrete to the abstract, from examples, to general theory, to further confirming examples, to reflections on the significance of the work.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 412 pp. Englisch.

Seller Inventory # 9789401067225

Bibliographic Details

• Title: The Semantic Foundations of Logic Volume 1: Propositional Logics
• Publisher: Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands Nov 2013
• Publication Date: 2013
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 9401067228
• ISBN 13: 9789401067225
• Binding: Taschenbuch
• Condition: Neu
• Dimensions: 235W x 155H x 23D millimeters 235 millimeters width by 155 millimeters height by 23 millimeters depth
• Weight: 622 grams

About this title

Synopsis

This book grew out of my confusion. If logic is objective how can there be so many logics? Is there one right logic, or many right ones? Is there some underlying unity that connects them? What is the significance of the mathematical theorems about logic which I've learned if they have no connection to our everyday reasoning? The answers I propose revolve around the perception that what one pays attention to in reasoning determines which logic is appropriate. The act of abstracting from our reasoning in our usual language is the stepping stone from reasoned argument to logic. We cannot take this step alone, for we reason together: logic is reasoning which has some objective value. For you to understand my answers, or perhaps better, conjectures, I have retraced my steps: from the concrete to the abstract, from examples, to general theory, to further confirming examples, to reflections on the significance of the work.

Review

`Throughout, the treatment is thorough and the writing is clear. Superb bibliography; glossary; extensive index. Highly recommended for every specialist in logic.' Choice, 1991