Sign of Pathology: U.S. Medical Rhetoric on Abortion, 1800s?1960s

Nathan Stormer

ISBN 10: 0271065559 / ISBN 13: 9780271065557

Published by Pennsylvania State University Press, 2015

About this Item

Series: Rsa Series in Transdisciplinary. Num Pages: 272 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: 1KBB; CFG; HBJK; HBLW; HBTB; MBP. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 231 x 157 x 23. Weight in Grams: 499. . 2015. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Seller Inventory # V9780271065557

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Sign of Pathology: U.S. Medical Rhetoric on Abortion, 1800s?1960s
• Publisher: Pennsylvania State University Press
• Publication Date: 2015
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0271065559
• ISBN 13: 9780271065557
• Binding: Hardcover
• Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

Much of the political polarization that grips the United States is rooted in the so-called culture wars, and no topic defines this conflict better than the often contentious and sometimes violent debate over abortion rights. In Sign of Pathology, Nathan Stormer reframes our understanding of this conflict by examining the medical literature on abortion from the 1800s to the 1960s.

Often framed as an argument over a right to choose versus a right to life, our current understanding of this conflict is as a contest over who has the better position on reproductive biology. Against this view, Sign of Pathology argues that, as it became a medical problem, abortion also became a template, more generally, for struggling with how to live―far exceeding discussions of the merits of providing abortions or how to care for patients. Abortion practices (and all the legal, moral, and ideological entanglements thereof) have rested firmly at the center of debate over many fundamental institutions and concepts―namely, the individual, the family, the state, human rights, and, indeed, the human. Medical rhetoric, then, was decisive in cultivating abortion as a mode of cultural critique, even weaponizing it for discursive conflict on these important subjects, although the goal of the medical practice of abortion has never been to establish this kind of struggle. Stormer argues that the medical discourse of abortion physicians transformed the state of abortion into an indicator that the culture was ill, attacking itself during and through pregnancy in a wrongheaded attempt to cope with reproduction.

About the Author

Nathan Stormer is Mark and Marcia Bailey Professor of Communication and Journalism at the University of Maine.