The Tiger and the Shark: Empirical Roots of Wave-Particle Dualism

Wheaton, Bruce R.; Kuhn, Thomas S. [Foreword]

ISBN 10: 0521358922 / ISBN 13: 9780521358927

Published by Cambridge University Press, 1991

About this Item

In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title!

Seller Inventory # Q-0521358922

Bibliographic Details

• Title: The Tiger and the Shark: Empirical Roots of Wave-Particle Dualism
• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Publication Date: 1991
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0521358922
• ISBN 13: 9780521358927
• Binding: paperback
• Condition: New
• Weight: 19 ounces

About this title

Synopsis

The early twentieth century brought about the rejection by physicists of the doctrine of determinism - the belief that complete knowledge of the initial conditions of an interaction in nature allows precise and unambiguous prediction of the outcome. This book traces the origins of a central problem leading to this change in viewpoint and paradoxes raised by attempts to formulate a consistent theory of the nature of light. It outlines the different approaches adopted by members of different national cultures to the apparent inconsistencies, explains why Einstein's early (1905) attempt at a resolution was not taken seriously for fifteen years, and describes the mixture of ideas that created a route to a new, antideterministic formulation of the laws of nature. Dr Wheaton describes the experimental work on the new forms of radiation found at the turn of the century and shows how the interpretation of energy transfer from X-rays to matter gradually transformed a classical wave explanation of light to one based on particle like quanta of energy, and further, he explains how influential scientists came reluctantly to accept a wavelike interpretation of matter as well. This new and distinctively different account of one of the major theoretical shifts in modern physical thought will be of fundamental interest to physical scientists and philosophers, as well as to historians of science.

From the Back Cover

This study grew out of concerns first raised while I was a student of physics. This inadequacy of most textbook discussions of historical and epistemological issues led me back to original papers and then to the literature on history of science.