UNKNOWN

Donald Wesling's leading argument, drawn from a crossover theory of the humanities, has philosophy and literature in a relation of constructive interference. What is common to both disciplines is the attempt to understand the necessary but often forgotten act of perceiving within the embodied mind. Wesling asks and answers: How does perceptual content enter thinking and writing?
His topics include a redefinition of Maurice Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology as a big-hearted rationality; quantum interference as a metaphor for thinking and also for the relation of self to the outer surround of things and persons; nine key terms from Merleau-Ponty as applied to the practical reading of poems and stories; the role of the sentence as an energy that structures thinking and writing; ordinary creativity and co-creativity.
Overall, Wesling emphasizes that the meaning for the humanities, now, may be found in Merleau-Ponty's belief that future work will be a search for "a secondary, laborious, rediscovered naïveté" and that in this pursuit "our relation to what is true must pass through others."

ABSTRACTING & INDEXING

Baidu Scholar
Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
BDS
BoD
Bowker Book Data
Ciando
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
Dimensions
EBSCO
ExLibris
Google Books
Google Scholar
Naviga
ReadCube
Semantic Scholar
TDOne (TDNet)
WorldCat (OCLC)
X-MOL

Donald Wesling is Professor Emeritus of English Literature at University of California San Diego. He has published on Wordsworth, John Muir, Edward Dorn, and Bakhtin; on rhyme, meter, and avant-garde prosody; and on how voice and emotion get into writing. His 2019 book on Animal Perception and Literary Language expanded his concerns to question how humans, evolved from animals, have learned to code perception of movement into sentences and scenes. This new book, on the one-in-another of perceiving-thinking-writing, develops his study on how perceptual content gets into pigment and words. Through the metaphor of interference, this book also advances an original argument on how literature and philosophy relate to each other.