Peter Kinane

In my late teens I sensed a logic leap in Western phil., from the flux of Mother Nature to universal absolute forms.

Writers had been trying to resolve the incoherence for 2,400 years.

I did my own thinking -

E-PS:

Second Principle:

Effect, indefinite- -dynamic and (inferentially) multifaceted, through, and indeed as, tension of relationship of indefinite- -dynamic, multifaceted ‘forces’.

(“Effect”: verb, non-referring).

It informs analysis of A.E. models ... e.g. just one FoR, hence no frame hopping.

1. He was informed by the failed phil. of his day.

2. This lead to his frame-hopping-models – just one FoR is sufficient.

3. Newton implied just one.

4. I provide alt. models to S.R. and G.R.

5. The data for the Mercury precession was available since 1859.

6. He believed, or was defending, his S.R. concept of light and so would _not_ have regarded it as accelerated by (g) force ...

7. The curving can be seen empirically and modelled.

8. 18.Nov. paper seems skewed 180°.