Hanus Vera (15 results)

Condition: very good. Gut/Very good: Buch bzw. Schutzumschlag mit wenigen Gebrauchsspuren an Einband, Schutzumschlag oder Seiten. / Describes a book or dust jacket that does show some signs of wear on either the binding, dust jacket or pages.

Condition: New.

Condition: New. In.

Paperback. Condition: New.

Condition: New.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Counterterrorism Compared | A Case Study of the United States and Germany After September 11 | Vera Hanus | Taschenbuch | 116 S. | Englisch | 2012 | AV Akademikerverlag | EAN 9783639407600 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Neuware - The attacks of 11 September 2001 represented a new terrorist trend which targets liberal Western states. The United States and Germany both interpreted September 11 as a declaration of war and an imminent security threat. However, the two states adopted different counterterrorism concepts in response to the attacks: The U.S. endorsed a war against terrorism, whereas Germany delineated a fight against terrorism. Why do some policy-makers understand terrorism as a war and others as a crime while facing the same terrorist threat In this publication the author Vera Hanus examines why the U.S. and Germany recur to diverging counterterrorism strategies after September 11. The analysis first traces the difference to the rhetorical frames and the subsequent policy frameworks . Secondly, three theories of International Relations Neorealism, Utilitarian Liberalism and Social Constructivist Institutionalism serve as complex and thorough explanatory framework. This case study of transatlantic counterterrorism addresses the academic community, policy-makers, journalists and all those interested in International Relations and the study of terrorism and counterterrorism policy.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Revision with unchanged content. The attacks of 11 September 2001 represented a new terrorist trend which targets liberal Western states. The United States and Germany both interpreted September 11 as a declaration of war and an imminent security threat. However, the two states adopted different counterterrorism concepts in response to the attacks: The U.S. endorsed a war against terrorism, whereas Germany delineated a fight against terrorism. Why do some policy-makers understand terrorism as a war and others as a crime while facing the same terrorist threat In this publication the author Vera Hanus examines why the U.S. and Germany recur to diverging counterterrorism strategies after September 11. The analysis first traces the difference to the rhetorical frames and the subsequent policy frameworks . Secondly, three theories of International Relations Neorealism, Utilitarian Liberalism and Social Constructivist Institutionalism serve as complex and thorough explanatory framework. This case study of transatlantic counterterrorism addresses the academic community, policy-makers, journalists and all those interested in International Relations and the study of terrorism and counterterrorism policy. 116 pp. Englisch.

Condition: New. Print on Demand pp. 116 67:B&W 6.69 x 9.61 in or 244 x 170 mm (Pinched Crown) Perfect Bound on White w/Gloss Lam.

Condition: New. Print on Demand pp. 116.

Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 116.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Revision with unchanged content. The attacks of 11 September 2001 represented a new terrorist trend which targets liberal Western states. The United States and Germany both interpreted September 11 as a declaration of war and an imminent security threat. However, the two states adopted different counterterrorism concepts in response to the attacks: The U.S. endorsed a 'war' against terrorism, whereas Germany delineated a 'fight' against terrorism. Why do some policy-makers understand terrorism as a war and others as a crime - while facing the same terrorist threat In this publication the author Vera Hanus examines why the U.S. and Germany recur to diverging counterterrorism strategies after September 11. The analysis first traces the difference to the rhetorical 'frames' and the subsequent 'policy frameworks'. Secondly, three theories of International Relations - Neorealism, Utilitarian Liberalism and Social Constructivist Institutionalism - serve as complex and thorough explanatory framework. This case study of transatlantic counterterrorism addresses the academic community, policy-makers, journalists and all those interested in International Relations and the study of terrorism and counterterrorism policy.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 116 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Revision with unchanged content. The attacks of 11 September 2001 represented a new terrorist trend which targets liberal Western states. The United States and Germany both interpreted September 11 as a declaration of war and an imminent security threat. However, the two states adopted different counterterrorism concepts in response to the attacks: The U.S. endorsed a war against terrorism, whereas Germany delineated a fight against terrorism. Why do some policy-makers understand terrorism as a war and others as a crime while facing the same terrorist threat In this publication the author Vera Hanus examines why the U.S. and Germany recur to diverging counterterrorism strategies after September 11. The analysis first traces the difference to the rhetorical frames and the subsequent policy frameworks . Secondly, three theories of International Relations Neorealism, Utilitarian Liberalism and Social Constructivist Institutionalism serve as complex and thorough explanatory framework. This case study of transatlantic counterterrorism addresses the academic community, policy-makers, journalists and all those interested in International Relations and the study of terrorism and counterterrorism policy.