Search preferences
Skip to main search results

Search filters

Product Type

  • All Product Types 
  • Books (1)
  • Magazines & Periodicals (No further results match this refinement)
  • Comics (No further results match this refinement)
  • Sheet Music (No further results match this refinement)
  • Art, Prints & Posters (No further results match this refinement)
  • Photographs (No further results match this refinement)
  • Maps (No further results match this refinement)
  • Manuscripts & Paper Collectibles (No further results match this refinement)

Condition Learn more

  • New (No further results match this refinement)
  • As New, Fine or Near Fine (No further results match this refinement)
  • Very Good or Good (No further results match this refinement)
  • Fair or Poor (No further results match this refinement)
  • As Described (1)

Binding

Collectible Attributes

  • First Edition (No further results match this refinement)
  • Signed (No further results match this refinement)
  • Dust Jacket (No further results match this refinement)
  • Seller-Supplied Images (No further results match this refinement)
  • Not Print on Demand (1)

Language (1)

Price

  • Any Price 
  • Under US$ 25 (No further results match this refinement)
  • US$ 25 to US$ 50 (No further results match this refinement)
  • Over US$ 50 
Custom price range (US$)

Seller Location

Seller Rating

  • US$ 720.63

    Free Shipping
    Ships from Denmark to U.S.A.

    Quantity: 1 available

    Add to basket

    Harlem, Les Heritieres Loosjes, 1887. Lex8vo.Orig. printed wrappers. Wrappers a bit frayed at edges. Upper right corner of frontwrapper gone. A faint stamp on wrapper and on titlepage. In "Archives Néerlandaises des Science Exactes et Naturelles. Redigée par J. Bosscha", Tome XXI. VI,492 pp. a. 8 plates (2 in chromolithography, 2 with 8 mounted photographs (photottypie)). Uncut and unopened, clean and fine.(The entire volume offered). Lorentz's paper pp. 103-176. First appearance of an importent paper on the aberration of light "in which he concluded that Fresnel's view of the luminiferous ether was superior to Stokes's. Unlike Stokes, Fresnel in his theory of aberration assumed that the ether near yhe earth did not participate in its motion. Lorentz thought that the hypothesis of the complete transparancy of matter to the ether was implicit in Fresnel's whole theory."(DSB VIII, p.493). Lorentz further shows that the results of the Michelson-Morley experiments did not vindicate the theory of Stokes as Michelson thought, and he demonstrates that the results can be explained by his own theory as a combination of Fresnel's and Stokes's theories.