Whistler Daniel (458 results)

Paperback. Condition: Very Good. It's a well-cared-for item that has seen limited use. The item may show minor signs of wear. All the text is legible, with all pages included. It may have slight markings and/or highlighting.

paperback. Condition: Very Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used books may not include companion materials, and may have some shelf wear or limited writing. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority!

Paperback. Condition: Good. No Jacket. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Paperback. Condition: Very Good.

Paperback. Condition: Very Good.

Hardcover. Condition: Good.

Soft cover. Condition: Good. 1st Edition. 236pp paperback, ownership signature, light crease to corner of front cover.

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. No Jacket. Daniel Whistler (illustrator). In green slipcase, originally published in 1977. In blue cloth boards, illustrated on the front in colour and gilt with gilt lettering on the spine. Spine a little faded. Maps drawn by Denys Baker on endpapers. Text is clean, binding is tight. Erratum slip from publisher stating that illustrations facing pages 134 and 163 have been transposed. In green slipcase in very good condition.

Paperback. Condition: As New. Never read, no marks or highlights in the text. Our copy is a new paperback showing only light shelfwear.

Condition: New. In.

Cloth. Condition: Fine. No Jacket. Daniel Whistler (illustrator). 1999, 292pp, illus., maps to eps, slipcase, light blue cloth w/ green, gold & silver design, owner's name in marker to reverse of front free ep, no dj, slight rubbing & shelfwear to slipcase, contents clean & unmarked.

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. No Jacket. Daniel Whistler (illustrator). The Riddle of the Sands - Folio Society, 1993 (Second Printing). A charming example of this atmospheric espionage classic, in solid condition. The red cloth binding shows moderate shelf wear and light rubbing to edges. The binding is sound and pages clear and intact. Please note: no slipcase included. A collectible edition?ideal for lovers of early spy literature or Folio Society collectors looking for a readable copy.

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. Dust Jacket Condition: Very Good. Whistler, Daniel (illustrator). 292pp, ten black and white plates (including frontispiece). Cyan cloth-covered boards; green and gilt design on front; silver titles on front and spine; map endpapers. 8vo. Slightly sun-faded and foxed spine, volume a little shaken. Otherwise volume neat, clean and bright. Green paper-covered slipcase with light shelf wear.

Paperback. Condition: New. During the first decade of the nineteenth century, F. W. J. Schelling was involved in three distinct controversies with one of his most perceptive and provocative critics, A. C. A. Eschenmayer. The first of these controversies took place in 1801 and focused on the philosophy of nature.Berger and Whistler provide a ground-breaking account of this moment in the history of philosophy. They argue that key Schellingian concepts, such as identity, potency and abstraction, were first forged in his early debate with Eschenmayer. Through a series of translations and commentaries, they show that the 1801 controversy is an essential resource for understanding Schelling's thought, the philosophy of nature and the origins of absolute idealism.Additionally, Berger and Whistler demonstrate how the Schelling-Eschenmayer controversy raises important issues for the philosophy of nature today, including questions about the relation between identity and difference and the possibility of explaining sensible qualities in terms of quantity. This ultimately leads to the formulation of the most basic methodological question for the philosophy of nature: must this philosophy be based upon a prior consideration of consciousness as Eschenmayer insists or might it simply begin with nature itself? By arguing for the latter position, Schelling challenges us to entertain the possibility that the philosophy of nature is first philosophy.

Condition: New.

Hardcover. Condition: Near Fine. Whistler, Daniel (illustrator). 1st Edition. Red hard cover. Spine slightly faded, else in fine condition. No slipcase.

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Francois Hemsterhuis (1721-1790) was the most significant Dutch philosopher after Spinoza. Daniel Whistler argues that Hemsterhuis' philosophy matters and that its exclusion from the canon of modern philosophy has been unjust. This is not just because of its reception history - its influence on later German thinkers, such as Goethe, Hamann, Hegel, Herder, Hlderlin, Jean Paul, Kant, Jacobi, Novalis, Schelling, the Schlegels, Schleiermacher, Wieland - but is primarily because Hemsterhuis' philosophy contains a rich assemblage of ideas and philosophical practices. Whistler looks specifically at Hemsterhuis' reflections on philosophical style and the strategies he employs to communicate ideas in his late dialogues. Taking seriously Hemsterhuis' newly-published complete correspondence as a significant philosophical text, he contends that Hemsterhuis deserves to be placed alongside Shaftesbury, Hamann, Friedrich Schlegel, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche as one of the preeminent philosophical stylists of modernity. Daniel Whistler argues that Hemsterhuis' philosophy matters and that its exclusion from the canon of modern philosophy has been unjust. This is not just because of its influence on later thinkers, but is primarily because Hemsterhuis' philosophy contains a rich assemblage of ideas and philosophical practices. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condition: New.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardcover. Condition: As New. Whistler, Daniel (illustrator). H/B, No Slipcase, Condition is As New. An owners name label to the title page.

Condition: New.

Paperback or Softback. Condition: New. Francois Hemsterhuis and the Writing of Philosophy. Book.

paperback. Condition: Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have some wear or writing/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority!

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. 1st Edition. *Veteran-Owned, Family-Run, Small Book Store in the Pacific Northwest* FAST SHIPPING!! clean text, no markings, printed boards, front cover slightly dented; otherwise LIKE NEW.

Condition: New.

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. From the shadow of the Kantian critique it to the Oxford debates over Darwinism that shook the discipline to the core, and from the death of God to the rise of new Evangelical movements, 19th-century theology was fundamentally reshaped by both internal struggles and external developments.This critical history charts this reshaping by focusing on the emerging theological themes of the period that cross authors, disciplines and nations. A team of internationally leading scholars map lines of thought from Romanticism through Hegelianism and positivism, exploring the richness of theology's interactions with anthropology, art, industry, literature, philosophy, science and society. From the shadow of the Kantian critique it to the Oxford debates over Darwinism that shook the discipline to the core, and from the death of God to the rise of new Evangelical movements, 19th-century theology was fundamentally reshaped by both internal struggles and external developments. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condition: New. Francois Hemsterhuis (1721-1790) was the most significant Dutch philosopher after Spinoza. Daniel Whistler argues that Hemsterhuis' philosophy matters and that its exclusion from the canon of modern philosophy has been unjust. This is not just because of its reception history - its influence on later German thinkers, such as Goethe, Hamann, Hegel, Herder, Holderlin, Jean Paul, Kant, Jacobi, Novalis, Schelling, the Schlegels, Schleiermacher, Wieland - but is primarily because Hemsterhuis' philosophy contains a rich assemblage of ideas and philosophical practices. Whistler looks specifically at Hemsterhuis' reflections on philosophical style and the strategies he employs to communicate ideas in his late dialogues. Taking seriously Hemsterhuis' newly-published complete correspondence as a significant philosophical text, he contends that Hemsterhuis deserves to be placed alongside Shaftesbury, Hamann, Friedrich Schlegel, Kierkegaard and Nietzsche as one of the preeminent philosophical stylists of modernity.

Condition: new.

Paperback. Condition: New. During the first decade of the nineteenth century, F. W. J. Schelling was involved in three distinct controversies with one of his most perceptive and provocative critics, A. C. A. Eschenmayer. The first of these controversies took place in 1801 and focused on the philosophy of nature.Berger and Whistler provide a ground-breaking account of this moment in the history of philosophy. They argue that key Schellingian concepts, such as identity, potency and abstraction, were first forged in his early debate with Eschenmayer. Through a series of translations and commentaries, they show that the 1801 controversy is an essential resource for understanding Schelling's thought, the philosophy of nature and the origins of absolute idealism.Additionally, Berger and Whistler demonstrate how the Schelling-Eschenmayer controversy raises important issues for the philosophy of nature today, including questions about the relation between identity and difference and the possibility of explaining sensible qualities in terms of quantity. This ultimately leads to the formulation of the most basic methodological question for the philosophy of nature: must this philosophy be based upon a prior consideration of consciousness as Eschenmayer insists or might it simply begin with nature itself? By arguing for the latter position, Schelling challenges us to entertain the possibility that the philosophy of nature is first philosophy.