Passions Minde Generall by Thomas Wright: First Edition (1 results)

Author
Title
Refine with Advanced Search

Refine your search

  • Books (1)

to

Custom price range (US$)

to

    • Language: English

      Published by University of Illinois Press, 1971

      0252001478 / 9780252001475

      • Hardcover
      • First Edition

      Seller: Avenue Victor Hugo Books, Newmarket, NH, U.S.A.Avenue Victor Hugo Books

      5-star seller
      Contact seller

      Condition: Used - Very good

      US$ 94.99

      US$ 4.35 shipping 
      Ships within U.S.A.

      Quantity: 1 available

      Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. First Edition thus. Octavo, 8 1/4" tall, lxiii [introduction] + ii + 352 [facsimile] + 4 [index] + 17 [philosophical declaration] pages, gilt spine titles on beige cloth over black bards. A very good minus, sturdy hard cover first edition thus with minor shelf wear BUT one corner bumped, little exterior soiling BUT with foxing to the fore-edges; binding solid, paper cream white with a very slight touch of foxing to the endpapers. Without dust jacket, if issued. There seems to be some controversy over which 'Thomas Wright' this is. The Sloan introduction contends it is the work of an ex-Jesuit priest who had disappeared twenty years previous. But to this "Thomas Wright (fl. 1604), a protégé of Henry Wriothesley, third earl of Southampton [q. v.], [who] had travelled in Italy, must be ascribed ?A Succinct Philosophicall Declaration of the Nature of Clymactericall Yeeres, occasioned by the Death of Queene Elizabeth. Written by T. W[right]. Printed for T. Thorpe,? London, 1604, 4to, and ?The Passions of the Minde in generall. By Thomas Wright,? London, 1601, 4to, which reappeared in 1604 ?corrected, enlarged, and with sundry new discourses augmented,? and was reissued in 1621 and 1630. This work was dedicated to Southampton in the hope that he may be ?delivered from inordinate passions,? and had commendatory verses by B. I. [? Ben Jonson]." Dictionary of National Biography. No matter. The work stands, and both Wrights have long been wronged. Without dust jacket (if issued).