Controversies in Global Politics and Science, Working Paper, Number VI, 'Revisiting Plessy and Brown: Why "Separate but Equal" Cannot Be Equal.'. This item is unavailable.Controversies in Global Politics and Science, Working Paper, Number VI, 'Revisiting Plessy and Brown: Why "Separate but Equal" Cannot Be Equal.'

[POLITICS]. Mohammed Saif-Alden Wattad. "Controversies in Global Politics and Science, Working Paper, Number VI, 'Revisiting Plessy and Brown: Why "Separate but Equal" Cannot Be Equal.'" Toronto: University of Toronto Munk Centre for International Studies at Trinity College, 2007. First edition. English language. Softcover. Nonfiction academic political science article. 8 1/2 x 5 1/2 inches. 3 oz. 34 pp. Wrappers toned, yellowed. Interior clean. Very Good. ISSN: 1715-3476. ISBN: 9780772708335. "This paper revisits the Supreme Court cases of Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education, focusing on the "separate but equal" doctrine. The author argues that equal protection analysis alone is insufficient to end discrimination and that the judiciary must understand the meaning of human dignity to successfully interact with society. The author suggests that treating individuals as means (based on skin color) rather than ends (based on qualifications) results in humiliation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. The paper asserts that true equality requires recognizing and protecting human dignity, which emphasizes the inherent worth and respect of each individual.".…