Diagnostic Issues in Depression and Generalized Anxiety Disorder : Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V

David Goldberg

ISBN 10: 089042456X / ISBN 13: 9780890424568

Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2010

About this Item

Former library copy. Pages intact with minimal writing/highlighting. The binding may be loose and creased. Dust jackets/supplements are not included. Includes library markings. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.

Seller Inventory # 56951028-20

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Diagnostic Issues in Depression and Generalized Anxiety Disorder : Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V
• Publisher: American Psychiatric Association Publishing
• Publication Date: 2010
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 089042456X
• ISBN 13: 9780890424568
• Binding: Soft cover
• Edition: 1st Edition.
• Condition: Good
• Weight: 1.382 pounds

About this title

Synopsis

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depression (MD) form the largest group of common mental disorders. These two conditions often occur together, and emerging evidence suggests several similarities between them. As we move toward revising the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders for DSM-V, Diagnostic Issues in Depression and Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Refining the Research Agenda for DSM-V explores the nosologic relationship between GAD and MD. This book acts as a guidepost for the entire DSM process. It reviews recent scientific advances in our understanding of the interrelationship between GAD and MD, summarizes the body of evidence into a few broad conclusions, and reflects on the implications of these findings for future nosologic efforts. The contributing authors review conceptual issues and empirical data from a variety of perspectives, including genetics, biology, treatment, development, course, predictors, disability, and psychosocial stressors. <I>Diagnostic Issues in Depression and Generalized Anxiety Disorder develops operationalized criteria for nosologic decisions that enable clinicians to bridge the gap between data and diagnostic recommendations. Not only does the methodology of investigating an active interchange between empirical and conceptual perspectives shed new light on the relationship between GAD and MD, but it also carries implications for the rest of DSM-V.

About the Author

<P><STRONG>David Goldberg, D.M., F.R.C.P.,</STRONG>is Professor Emeritus at the Institute of Psychiatr at King's College in London, England.<STRONG>Kenneth S. Kendler, M.D.,</STRONG>is Distinguished Professor in the Departments of Psychiatry and Human Genetics at the Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics in the School of Medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia.<STRONG>Paul J. Sirovatka, M.S. (1947--2007),</STRONG>was Director of Research Policy Analysis in the Division of Research and American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education at the American Psychiatric Association in Arlington, Virginia.<STRONG><P>Darrel A. Regier, M.D., M.P.H.,</STRONG>is Executive Director of the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education and Director of the Division of Research at the American Psychiatric Association in Arlington, Virginia.</P>