There is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch (Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis)

Phil Hutchinson

ISBN 10: 0754647765 / ISBN 13: 9780754647768

Published by Routledge, 2008

About this Item

Contends that Peter Winch has been misrepresented in both literature and in contemporary critiques of his writing. This book contends that social studies as a discipline has yet to rise to the challenges posed by Winch. Series Editor(s): Francis, Dr. Dave; Hester, Dr. Stephen; Carlin, Dr. Andrew. Series: Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Num Pages: 156 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: HPS; JHBA. Category: (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 163 x 235 x 16. Weight in Grams: 444. . 2008. 1st Edition. hardcover. . . . .

Seller Inventory # V9780754647768

Bibliographic Details

• Title: There is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch (Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis)
• Publisher: Routledge
• Publication Date: 2008
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0754647765
• ISBN 13: 9780754647768
• Binding: Hardcover
• Edition: 1st Edition
• Condition: New

About this title

Synopsis

The death of Peter Winch in 1997 sparked a revived interest in his work with this book arguing his work suffered misrepresentation in both recent literature and in contemporary critiques of his writing. Debates in philosophy and sociology about foundational questions of social ontology and methodology often claim to have adequately incorporated and moved beyond Winch's concerns. Re-establishing a Winchian voice, the authors examine how such contentions involve a failure to understand central themes in Winch's writings and that the issues which occupied him in his Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy and later papers remain central to social studies. The volume offers a careful reading of the text in alliance with Wittgensteinian insights and alongside a focus on the nature and results of social thought and inquiry. It draws parallels with other movements in the social studies, notably ethnomethodology, to demonstrate how Winch's central claim is both more significant and more difficult to transcend than sociologists and philosophers have hitherto imagined.

About the Author

Phil Hutchinson, Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK, Rupert Read, Reader in Philosophy, University of East Anglia, UK and Wes Sharrock, Professor of Sociology, University of Manchester, UK.