Transitional Objects and Potential Spaces: Literary Uses of D. W. Winnicott (Phoenix Poets (Paperback))

Rudnytsky, Peter L., editor

ISBN 10: 0231075731 / ISBN 13: 9780231075732

Published by Columbia University Press, 1994

About this Item

Description:
An interdisciplinary collection exploring the literary and cultural applications of D. W. Winnicott?s psychoanalytic theories, especially transitional objects, potential space, creativity, and cultural experience. Edited by Peter L. Rudnytsky, the volume brings together previously published essays and critical studies applying Winnicott?s ideas to literature and culture.
Columbia University Press records the hardcover edition in 1993 and paperback edition in 1994; the paperback ISBN is 9780231075732. Columbia University Press

Detailed Condition:
Very Good softcover. Pale blue and white wrappers show light shelf wear, minor rubbing, and a few small marks. Corners and edges show light wear. Spine is straight and intact. Page block is clean with mild age toning. Interior appears clean and unmarked in the pages examined. Binding remains firm.

Shipping / Returns:
Carefully packed and shipped by KC Midwest Books. Returns accepted in accordance with AbeBooks policies.
PSYCH 3a.

Seller Inventory # ABE-1790725632458

Bibliographic Details

• Title: Transitional Objects and Potential Spaces: Literary Uses of D. W. Winnicott (Phoenix Poets (Paperback))
• Publisher: Columbia University Press
• Publication Date: 1994
• Language: English
• ISBN 10: 0231075731
• ISBN 13: 9780231075732
• Binding: Soft cover
• Edition: 1st Edition
• Condition: Very Good
• Dimensions: 6W x 9H x 0.71D inches 6 inches width by 9 inches height by 0.71 inches depth
• Weight: 1.001 pounds
• Seller catalogs:
  • Psychoanalysis
  • Psychology
  • Literary Criticism & Theory

About this title

Synopsis

The contributors to this volume explore the impact of D.W. Winnicott's psychoanalytical theories, focusing on the relevance of his independent version of object relations theory to psychoanalytical literary criticism.