Synopsis
by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach? In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation? When Socrates asked, for example, "What is virtue?", he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incompatibility. Now, to a question as to what X, Y, or Z is, one can answer in many ways and nothing in the question itself prohibits multiplicity. Virtue is courage, is justice, and so on.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Other Popular Editions of the Same Title
Search results for From Metaphysics to Rhetoric (Synthese Library, 202)
Stock Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric (Synthese Library, 202)
Seller: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Seller rating 5 out of 5 stars
Condition: New. Seller Inventory # ABLIING23Apr0316110332180
Stock Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric (Synthese Library, 202)
Seller: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, United Kingdom
Seller rating 5 out of 5 stars
Condition: New. In. Seller Inventory # ria9789027728142_new
Buy New
US$ 127.57
Shipping:
US$ 15.76
From United Kingdom to U.S.A.
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric
Published by
Springer Netherlands Jul 1989, 1989
ISBN 10: 9027728143
ISBN 13: 9789027728142
New
Hardcover
Seller: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
Seller rating 5 out of 5 stars
Buch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation When Socrates asked, for example, 'What is virtue ', he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incompatibility. Now, to a question as to what X, Y, or Z is, one can answer in many ways and nothing in the question itself prohibits multiplicity. Virtue is courage, is justice, and so on. 208 pp. Englisch. Seller Inventory # 9789027728142
Stock Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric
Seller: Books Puddle, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Seller rating 4 out of 5 stars
Condition: New. pp. 208. Seller Inventory # 263095518
Seller Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric
Print on DemandSeller: moluna, Greven, Germany
Seller rating 4 out of 5 stars
Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play. Seller Inventory # 5815597
Buy New
US$ 109.91
Shipping:
US$ 56.66
From Germany to U.S.A.
Quantity: Over 20 available
Stock Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric
Print on DemandSeller: Majestic Books, Hounslow, United Kingdom
Seller rating 4 out of 5 stars
Condition: New. Print on Demand pp. 208 52:B&W 6.14 x 9.21in or 234 x 156mm (Royal 8vo) Case Laminate on White w/Gloss Lam. Seller Inventory # 5800961
Buy New
US$ 168.12
Shipping:
US$ 8.55
From United Kingdom to U.S.A.
Quantity: 4 available
Stock Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric
Print on DemandSeller: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Germany
Seller rating 4 out of 5 stars
Condition: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 208. Seller Inventory # 183095508
Seller Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric
Print on DemandSeller: preigu, Osnabrück, Germany
Seller rating 5 out of 5 stars
Buch. Condition: Neu. From Metaphysics to Rhetoric | Michel Meyer | Buch | vi | Englisch | 1989 | Springer Netherland | EAN 9789027728142 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. Seller Inventory # 102439488
Seller Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric
Published by
Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands Jul 1989, 1989
ISBN 10: 9027728143
ISBN 13: 9789027728142
New
Hardcover
Seller: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Germany
Seller rating 5 out of 5 stars
Buch. Condition: Neu. Neuware -by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation When Socrates asked, for example, 'What is virtue ', he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incompatibility. Now, to a question as to what X, Y, or Z is, one can answer in many ways and nothing in the question itself prohibits multiplicity. Virtue is courage, is justice, and so on.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 208 pp. Englisch. Seller Inventory # 9789027728142
Seller Image
From Metaphysics to Rhetoric
Published by
Springer Netherlands, Springer Netherlands, 1989
ISBN 10: 9027728143
ISBN 13: 9789027728142
New
Hardcover
Seller: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germany
Seller rating 5 out of 5 stars
Buch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation When Socrates asked, for example, 'What is virtue ', he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incompatibility. Now, to a question as to what X, Y, or Z is, one can answer in many ways and nothing in the question itself prohibits multiplicity. Virtue is courage, is justice, and so on. Seller Inventory # 9789027728142