Daniel Michael Mullin (13 results)

Soft cover. Condition: Very Good. Booty Capitalism and Capitalism's Booty: Salves and Slavery in Ancient Rome and the American South; Women and the Comparative Study of American Negro Slavery; Slave Coast of Europe; Salvery: Annual Bibliographical Supplement. 15 pages have underlinings, check marks or a note. Otherwise clean. Ships quickly worldwide. 0.0 0.0.

Condition: New.

Condition: New. In.

Condition: New.

Hardcover. Condition: Fine. 1st Edition. 159 pages : illustrations (chiefly color) ; 29 cm ISBN 9780981960005, 0981960006 OCLC 317463470 color pictorial boards, no dustjacket ; "Using artwork created by individuals diagnosed with ASD, Drawing Autism celebrates their artistry and self-expression while also serving as an accessible point of entry into understanding how ASD manifests in individuals. Autism is known as a 'spectrum disorder' because no two diagnoses are exactly the same; however, there are characteristic traits of ASD. Through their art, the contributors exhibit unique perspectives on how they see the world and their places in it. The book's seven chapters . speak directly to the core characteristics of ASD"--Provided by publisher ; "Drawing autism celebrates the artistry and self-expression found in the drawings, paintings and collages created by people diagnosed with autism. The work of over 50 contributors exhibits an array of unique perspectives on how these individuals see the world and their places in it"--Publisher description ; Contents: Nurturing the ways in which we see the world -- As seen through the autism spectrum -- Interaction, individual and societal -- Repetition, repetition, repetition -- Getting from here to there -- Bird's eye view -- Another world -- It's all history -- Art for art's sake -- Artists' bios ; Artists include: Kay Aitch, Milda Bandzaite, David Barth, Shawn Belanger, Gregory Blockstock, JW Beidges, Esther Brokow, Susan Brown, Pam Button, Justin Canha, Cesarenko, Felix, Vrinda Chaswal, Eric Chen, Bailey Clark, Marilyn Cosho, Marcy Deutsch, Wout Devolder, Noah Erenberg, Trisha Ferguson, Emile Fey-Legault, Zach Hamm, Alexandra Hill, Kevin Hosseini, James Kenneally, Wil Kerner, Amanda Lamunyon, Jonathan Lerman, Stephen Mallon, Rachel Marks, Robert Maxwell, Eleni Michael, Ted Mauris, Daniel Muller, Jesica Park, Josh Peddle, Daniel Pout, Vedhas Rangan, Orko Roy, Glen Russ, Caryn Schlosser, Rohan Sonalker, Philip Stoeppelwerth, DJ Svaboda, Klaas Telkampo, Charles Topping, Alexandra Vallinga, Sonna Williams, Ping Lian Yeak ; two dots on edge olf title page, else FINE. Book.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condition: Like New. Like New. book.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. KlappentextrnrnJuergen Habermas has argued that democracy depends on all citizens recognizing the legitimacy of the law. Therefore, political argument must appeal only to public reason which is secular. Religious citizens must translate their rea.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Democracy Without Secularism | A Pragmatist Critique of Habermas | Daniel Michael Mullin | Taschenbuch | Kartoniert / Broschiert | Englisch | 2013 | Vandeplas-Grether Publishing BV | EAN 9789491533006 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Libri GmbH, Europaallee 1, 36244 Bad Hersfeld, gpsr[at]libri[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Jürgen Habermas has argued that democracy depends on all citizens recognizing the legitimacy of the law. Therefore, political argument must appeal only to public reason which is secular. Religious citizens must translate their reasons into a secular language accessible to the public. This dissertation argues that religious arguments are justified in public discourse if they refrain from dogmatism. Moreover, there is nothing inherent in secular reasons that make them publicly accessible or likely to generate consensus among members of a pluralistic society. If we treat religious arguments as simply arguments with controversial premises, it becomes less clear why religious arguments are singled out as particularly problematic for liberal democracies, since many secular political arguments share this feature. Granted, religious reasons are unlikely to secure consensus, but this does not count against them if consensus is not the goal of democratic discourse. This dissertation makes the case that Habermas, and other liberal theorists such as Rawls, have placed too much emphasis on consensus as the goal of democracy. Moreover, what they refer to is not practical consensus achieved pragmatically through compromise, but an idealized consensus that is the achievement of secular reason. This is problematic for two main reasons: there is no normative reason to think we ought to attain such consensus and such consensus is unlikely to be achieved in practice. Thus, there seems to be no normative force to the claim that religious citizens ought to translate their arguments into secular language.