Patrik Bye (22 results)

Condition: Sehr gut. VI, 388 S. Einband leicht berieben. - Laryngeal Underspecification and Richness of the Base DANIEL CURRIE HALL -- Underlying representations that do not minimize grammatical violations ANDREW NEVINS AND BERT VAUX -- Allomorphy - selection, not optimization PATRIK BYE -- A freer input: Yowlumne opacity and the Enriched Input Model ORHAN ORGAN AND RONALD SPROUSE -- Derived Environment Effects and Consistency of Exponence MARC VAN OOSTENDORP -- Colored turbid accents and containment: A case study from lexical stress ANTHI REVITHIADOU -- Freedom, Interpretability, and the Loop PAUL DE LACY -- Restraint of Analysis JOHN J. MCCARTHY -- The roles of GEN and CON in modeling ternary rhythm CURT RICE -- Representational complexity in syllable structure and its consequences for GEN and CON JENNIFER L. SMITH -- Restricting GEN CHRISTIAN UFFMANN -- The division of labor between segment-internal structure and violable constraints BRUCE MORÉN -- Variables in Optimality Theory CHRIS GOLSTON. ISBN 9783110193596 Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 693 Fadengehefteter Originalpappband.…

Hardcover. Condition: New. Sealed in original plastic.

Condition: New. In English.

Condition: New.

Hardcover. Condition: New.

Condition: New.

Hardcover. Condition: New. Aims to draw together papers that argue for a focus on the role of hard constraints on phonological representations as well as the processes that operate on them. Taking Optimality Theory as the starting point, this book discusses the question to what degree the Generator function Gen should be given freedom of analysis on three fronts.…

Condition: new.

Hardback. Condition: New. This volume draws together papers that argue for a renewed focus on the role of hard constraints on phonological representations as well as the processes that operate on them. These are issues that have been sidelined since the shift in emphasis in phonological research to functionally grounded output-oriented constraints. Taking Optimality Theory as their starting point, the articles attack the question to what degree the Generator function Gen should be given freedom of analysis on three fronts. (1) What is the nature of the representations that Gen manipulates? Is a return to more articulated theories of segmental and prosodic representation desirable? (2) What restrictions might there be on the operations that Gen carries out on representations? Should Gen be endowed with structure-changing potential, as assumed in work couched within Correspondence Theory, or is a return to the principle of Containment preferable? Should Gen be restricted in the number of edits it can carry out at any one time? Should Gen be restricted to generating phonetically interpretable candidates? (3) What is the relationship between Gen and functionally arbitrary or opaque phonological patterns? Should Gen's freedom be restricted in order to account for language-specific phonology? The solutions offered to these questions bear significantly on current issues that are of fundamental concern in linguistic theory, including representations, parallelism vs. serialism, and the division of labour between linguistic modules. The authors scrutinize these issues using data from a variety of unrelated languages, including Czech, English, Greek, Haitian Creole, Hawaiian, Lardil, Spanish, Turkish, and Yowlumne.…

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condition: New. pp. vi + 388.

Hardcover. Condition: Brand New. 1st edition. 388 pages. 9.25x6.25x1.00 inches. In Stock.

Condition: New. pp. vi + 388.

Hardback. Condition: New. This volume draws together papers that argue for a renewed focus on the role of hard constraints on phonological representations as well as the processes that operate on them. These are issues that have been sidelined since the shift in emphasis in phonological research to functionally grounded output-oriented constraints. Taking Optimality Theory as their starting point, the articles attack the question to what degree the Generator function Gen should be given freedom of analysis on three fronts. (1) What is the nature of the representations that Gen manipulates? Is a return to more articulated theories of segmental and prosodic representation desirable? (2) What restrictions might there be on the operations that Gen carries out on representations? Should Gen be endowed with structure-changing potential, as assumed in work couched within Correspondence Theory, or is a return to the principle of Containment preferable? Should Gen be restricted in the number of edits it can carry out at any one time? Should Gen be restricted to generating phonetically interpretable candidates? (3) What is the relationship between Gen and functionally arbitrary or opaque phonological patterns? Should Gen's freedom be restricted in order to account for language-specific phonology? The solutions offered to these questions bear significantly on current issues that are of fundamental concern in linguistic theory, including representations, parallelism vs. serialism, and the division of labour between linguistic modules. The authors scrutinize these issues using data from a variety of unrelated languages, including Czech, English, Greek, Haitian Creole, Hawaiian, Lardil, Spanish, Turkish, and Yowlumne.…

Condition: New. 2007. Hardcover. . . . . .

Buch. Condition: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - This volume draws together papers that argue for a renewed focus on the role of hard constraints on phonological representations as well as the processes that operate on them. These are issues that have been sidelined since the shift in emphasis in phonological research to functionally grounded output-oriented constraints. Taking Optimality Theory as their starting point, the articles attack the question to what degree the Generator function Gen should be given freedom of analysis on three fronts. (1) What is the nature of the representations that Gen manipulates Is a return to more articulated theories of segmental and prosodic representation desirable (2) What restrictions might there be on the operations that Gen carries out on representations Should Gen be endowed with structure-changing potential, as assumed in work couched within Correspondence Theory, or is a return to the principle of Containment preferable Should Gen be restricted in the number of edits it can carry out at any one time Should Gen be restricted to generating phonetically interpretable candidates (3) What is the relationship between Gen and functionally arbitrary or opaque phonological patterns Should Gen's freedom be restricted in order to account for language-specific phonology The solutions offered to these questions bear significantly on current issues that are of fundamental concern in linguistic theory, including representations, parallelism vs. serialism, and the division of labour between linguistic modules. The authors scrutinize these issues using data from a variety of unrelated languages, including Czech, English, Greek, Haitian Creole, Hawaiian, Lardil, Spanish, Turkish, and Yowlumne.…

Condition: New. 2007. Hardcover. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condition: New. NEW. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

HRD. Condition: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Buch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This volume draws together papers that argue for a renewed focus on the role of hard constraints on phonological representations as well as the processes that operate on them. These are issues that have been sidelined since the shift in emphasis in phonological research to functionally grounded output-oriented constraints. Taking Optimality Theory as their starting point, the articles attack the question to what degree the Generator function Gen should be given freedom of analysis on three fronts. (1) What is the nature of the representations that Gen manipulates Is a return to more articulated theories of segmental and prosodic representation desirable (2) What restrictions might there be on the operations that Gen carries out on representations Should Gen be endowed with structure-changing potential, as assumed in work couched within Correspondence Theory, or is a return to the principle of Containment preferable Should Gen be restricted in the number of edits it can carry out at any one time Should Gen be restricted to generating phonetically interpretable candidates (3) What is the relationship between Gen and functionally arbitrary or opaque phonological patterns Should Gen's freedom be restricted in order to account for language-specific phonology The solutions offered to these questions bear significantly on current issues that are of fundamental concern in linguistic theory, including representations, parallelism vs. serialism, and the division of labour between linguistic modules. The authors scrutinize these issues using data from a variety of unrelated languages, including Czech, English, Greek, Haitian Creole, Hawaiian, Lardil, Spanish, Turkish, and Yowlumne. 396 pp. Englisch.…

Buch. Condition: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -This volume draws together papers that argue for a renewed focus on the role of hard constraints on phonological representations as well as the processes that operate on them. These are issues that have been sidelined since the shift in emphasis in phonological research to functionally grounded output-oriented constraints. Taking Optimality Theory as their starting point, the articles attack the question to what degree the Generator function Gen should be given freedom of analysis on three fronts.(1) What is the nature of the representations that Gen manipulates Is a return to more articulated theories of segmental and prosodic representation desirable (2) What restrictions might there be on the operations that Gen carries out on representations Should Gen be endowed with structure-changing potential, as assumed in work couched within Correspondence Theory, or is a return to the principle of Containment preferable Should Gen be restricted in the number of edits it can carry out at any one time Should Gen be restricted to generating phonetically interpretable candidates (3) What is the relationship between Gen and functionally arbitrary or opaque phonological patterns Should Gen's freedom be restricted in order to account for language-specific phonology The solutions offered to these questions bear significantly on current issues that are of fundamental concern in linguistic theory, including representations, parallelism vs. serialism, and the division of labour between linguistic modules. The authors scrutinize these issues using data from a variety of unrelated languages, including Czech, English, Greek, Haitian Creole, Hawaiian, Lardil, Spanish, Turkish, and Yowlumne.De Gruyter Mouton, Genthiner Straße 13, 10785 Berlin 396 pp. Englisch.…