Practices Principles by Tunick Mark (31 results)

Hardcover. Condition: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Paperback. Condition: Used-Very Good. Some shelf-wear. Else clean copy.

Condition: good. A copy that has been read, remains in good condition. All pages are intact, and the cover is intact. The spine and cover show signs of wear. Pages can include notes and highlighting and show signs of wear, and the copy can include "From the library of" labels or previous owner inscriptions. 100% GUARANTEE! Shipped with delivery confirmation, if you're not satisfied with purchase please return item! Ships via media mail.…

Paperback. Condition: New.

Condition: very good. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c1998, Orig. cloth binding. Dustjacket. Viii, 242p ; 25cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Condition : very good copy. ISBN 9780691015606. Keywords : PHILOSOPHY, engels recht.

Condition: New.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condition: New. 2001. Paperback. . . . . .

Paperback. Condition: New. Brand new book, sourced directly from publisher. Dispatch time is 3-4 days from our warehouse. Book will be sent in robust, secure packaging to ensure it reaches you securely.

Paperback. Condition: New. A Japanese woman living in California attempts parent-child suicide, an ancient Japanese custom called "oyako-shinju," in order to rid herself of shame upon learning that her husband has a mistress. She survives, but her two children are drowned in the attempt. Since her attempt was made in accordance with the standards of Japanese culture, should she be tried by the standards and laws of the United States? Are there universally valid moral principles that dictate what is right? Or are moral judgments culturally relative, ultimately dictated by conventions and practices that vary among societies? In Practices and Principles, Mark Tunick takes up the debate between universalists and relativists, and, in political philosophy, between communitarians and liberals, each of which has roots in an earlier debate between Kant and Hegel. Tunick focuses on three case studies: promises, contract law, and the Fourth Amendment issue of privacy. In his analysis, he rejects both uncritical deference to social practice and draconian adherence to principles when making legal and ethical judgments. He argues that we do not always need to choose between abstract principles and social practices.Sometimes we appeal to both; sometimes we need to appeal to shared social norms; and sometimes, where there is no ethical community, we can appeal only to principles. Ultimately, Tunick rejects simplified arguments that force us to choose between either practices or principles, universalism or relativism, and liberalism or communitarianism.…

Paperback. Condition: Very Good. PAPERBACK 1998. Bump to the top corners. Clean & tight. No inscriptions. Dispatched ROYAL MAIL FIRST CLASS with TRACKING next working day or sooner, securely boxed in cardboard. ref 31/26. Practices and Principles: Approaches to Ethical and Legal Judgment. ISBN: 0691070792. …

Condition: New.

Condition: New. 2001. Paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Condition: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback / softback. Condition: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

paperback. Condition: New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title.

Condition: New. Satisfaction Guaranteed or your money back.

Condition: New. In English.

hardcover. Condition: New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title.

Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 256 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Condition: New. A Japanese woman living in California attempts parent-child suicide, an ancient Japanese custom called "oyako-shinju," in order to rid herself of shame upon learning that her husband has a mistress. She survives, but her two children are drowned in the attempt. Since her attempt was made in accordance with the standards of Japanese culture, should she be tried by the standards and laws of the United States? Are there universally valid moral principles that dictate what is right? Or are moral judgments culturally relative, ultimately dictated by conventions and practices that vary among societies? In Practices and Principles, Mark Tunick takes up the debate between universalists and relativists, and, in political philosophy, between communitarians and liberals, each of which has roots in an earlier debate between Kant and Hegel. Tunick focuses on three case studies: promises, contract law, and the Fourth Amendment issue of privacy. In his analysis, he rejects both uncritical deference to social practice and draconian adherence to principles when making legal and ethical judgments. He argues that we do not always need to choose between abstract principles and social practices.Sometimes we appeal to both; sometimes we need to appeal to shared social norms; and sometimes, where there is no ethical community, we can appeal only to principles. Ultimately, Tunick rejects simplified arguments that force us to choose between either practices or principles, universalism or relativism, and liberalism or communitarianism.…

Condition: New. Satisfaction Guaranteed or your money back.

orig.cloth Minor rubbing. Binding corner bump. VG., dustwrapper. 24x15cm, viii, 242 pp. Contents: Kant versus Hegel: Kant's Principle Conception; Hegel's Criticism of Kant's Principle Conception; Hegel on the Importance of Social Practice; Implications; Kant or Hegel: Principles without Practice or Principles Immanent in Practice?; Promises; The Problem; Scanlon's Example; Principle Conceptions of Promising; Scanlon's Principles M and F; Conclusion: Practices and the Obligation to Keep Promises; Contracts: Problems in Contract Law; Principles; Practices and Principles in Contract Law; Privacy: The Problem; Determining the Reasonableness of Expectations of Privacy: Practice or Principles? Incorporating Practice and Principle in Fourth Amendment Reasonable-Expectation-of-Privacy Analysis: The Mischance Principle Applied; Practices, Principles, and Contemporary Political Theory; The Role of Social Practice in Ethical and Legal Judging;Contemporary Political Theorists on the Role of Social Practice; Practices and Principles; Practices, Principles, and the Liberal- Communication Debate; Practices, Principles, and the Relativism- Universalism Debate. [" Tunick focuses on three case studies: promises, contract law, and the Fourth Amendment issue of privacy. In his analysis, he rejects both uncritical deference to social practice and draconian adherence to principles when making legal and ethical judgments. He argues that we do not always need to choose between abstract principles and social practices. Sometimes we appeal to both sometimes we need to appeal to shared social norms and sometimes, where there is no ethical community, Minor rubbing. Binding corner bump. VG., dustwrapper.…

orig.cloth. 24x16cm, viii,242 pp Contents: Kant versus Hegel: Kant's Principle Conception; Hegel's Criticism of Kant's Principle Conception; Hegel on the Importance of Social Practice; Implications; Kant or Hegel: Principles without Practice or Principles Immanent in Practice?; Promises: The Problem; Scanlon's Examåle; Principle Conceptions of Promising; Scanlon's Principles M & F; Conclusion: Practices & the Obligation to Keep Promises; Contracts: Problems in Contract Law; Principles; Practices & Principles in Contract Law; Privacy: The Problem: Determining the Reasonableness of Expectations of Privacy: Practice or Principles? Incorporating Practice & Principle in Fourth Amendment Reasonable-Expectation-of-Privacy Analysis: The Mischance Principle Applied; Practices, Principles & Contemporary Political Theory: The Role of Social Practice in Ethical & Legal Judging; Contemporary Political Theorists on the Role of Social Practice; Practices & Principles;Practices, Principles & the Liberal-Communitarian Debate; Practices, Principles & the Relativism-Universalism Debate. Minor rubbing. VG., dustwrapper.…

Paperback. Condition: Brand New. 256 pages. 9.00x6.00x0.75 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Paperback / softback. Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Condition: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Takes up the debate between universalists and relativists, and, in political philosophy, between communitarians and liberals, each of which has roots in an earlier debate between Kant and Hegel. This book focuses on three case studies: promises, contract la.…

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - A Japanese woman living in California attempts parent-child suicide, an ancient Japanese custom called 'oyako-shinju,' in order to rid herself of shame upon learning that her husband has a mistress. She survives, but her two children are drowned in the attempt. Since her attempt was made in accordance with the standards of Japanese culture, should she be tried by the standards and laws of the United States Are there universally valid moral principles that dictate what is right Or are moral judgments culturally relative, ultimately dictated by conventions and practices that vary among societies In Practices and Principles, Mark Tunick takes up the debate between universalists and relativists, and, in political philosophy, between communitarians and liberals, each of which has roots in an earlier debate between Kant and Hegel. Tunick focuses on three case studies: promises, contract law, and the Fourth Amendment issue of privacy. In his analysis, he rejects both uncritical deference to social practice and draconian adherence to principles when making legal and ethical judgments. He argues that we do not always need to choose between abstract principles and social practices. Sometimes we appeal to both; sometimes we need to appeal to shared social norms; and sometimes, where there is no ethical community, we can appeal only to principles. Ultimately, Tunick rejects simplified arguments that force us to choose between either practices or principles, universalism or relativism, and liberalism or communitarianism.…