Excerpt from The American Law Register, Vol. 12: From January to December, 1873
Jones has since been overruled by the Supreme Court of Penn sylvania, in Craig v. Graig, 5 Rae 91.
In 10 Peters 412, story, J delivering the opinion of the court, said: It is true that in Latterell v. Reynell, 1 Mod. Rep. 282, it was held, that though hearsay be not allowed, as direct evi dence, yet, it may be admitted, in corroboration of a witness's testimony, to show that he affirmed the same things upon other occasions and that he is still constant to himself. Lord Chief Baron gilbert has asserted the same opinion in his treatise on Evidence, p. 135. But Mr. Justice buller, in his Nisi Prius treatise, p. 294, says: But clearly it is not evidence in chief and it seems doubtful, whether it is so in reply or not. The same question came before the House of Lords in the Berkeley Peerage Case, 4 Camp. 401, and it was there said by Lord redesdale, that he had always understood, that, for the purpose of impugn ing the testimony of a witness, his declarations at another time might be inquired into but not for the purpose of confirming his evidence. Lord eldon expressed his decided opinion, that this was the true rule to be observed by the counsel in the cause.
About the Publisher
Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com
This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
"synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title.
Shipping:
US$ 48.61
From Germany to U.S.A.
Shipping:
FREE
From United Kingdom to U.S.A.
Seller: Forgotten Books, London, United Kingdom
Paperback. Condition: New. Print on Demand. This book explores the landmark decision in Latterell v. Reynell, which established the principle that hearsay evidence can be used to corroborate a witness's testimony but not as direct evidence. The author analyzes the historical significance of this case, its influence on subsequent legal decisions, and its impact on the development of the law of evidence in both England and the United States. The book provides a comprehensive examination of the legal and historical context of the decision, exploring its implications for the reliability of witness testimony and the role of hearsay evidence in legal proceedings. The author also discusses the exceptions to the hearsay rule and the factors that courts consider when evaluating the admissibility of hearsay evidence. This in-depth analysis offers valuable insights into the complexities of hearsay evidence and its role in the legal system. This book is a reproduction of an important historical work, digitally reconstructed using state-of-the-art technology to preserve the original format. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in the book. print-on-demand item. Seller Inventory # 9781527931985_0
Quantity: Over 20 available
Seller: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # LX-9781527931985
Quantity: 15 available
Seller: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, United Kingdom
PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000. Seller Inventory # LX-9781527931985
Quantity: 15 available
Seller: Buchpark, Trebbin, Germany
Condition: Hervorragend. Zustand: Hervorragend | Seiten: 862 | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher. Seller Inventory # 30297130/1
Quantity: 1 available