Lorelei Moosbrugger (13 results)

Paperback. Condition: New. *NEW* paperback. Fresh from a distributor with no price tags and no remainder marks.

Paperback. Condition: Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have some wear or writing/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority!

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Where politics is dominated by two large parties, as in the United States, politicians should be relatively immune to the influence of small groups. Yet narrow interest groups often win private benefits against majority preferences and at great public expense. Why? The "vulnerability thesis" is that the electoral system is largely to blame, making politicians in two-party systems more vulnerable to interest group demands than politicians in multiparty systems. Political scientist Lorelei Moosbrugger ranks democracies on a continuum of political vulnerability and tests the thesis by examining agrochemical policy in Austria, Britain, Germany, Sweden, and the European Union. Using the example of the agrochemical industry in four countries - Britain, Germany, Austria, and Sweden, the author posits a continuum of political vulnerability that predicts how different combinations of institutions should affect a political system's ability to resist interest group pressure. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Condition: New. In.

Condition: New. Using the example of the agrochemical industry in four countries - Britain, Germany, Austria, and Sweden, the author posits a continuum of political vulnerability that predicts how different combinations of institutions should affect a political system's ability to resist interest group pressure. Num Pages: 224 pages. BIC Classification: 1DBK; 1DFA; 1DFG; 1DNS; JPH; JPWD. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 234 x 162 x 13. Weight in Grams: 310. . 2012. Paperback. . . . .

Condition: New. Using the example of the agrochemical industry in four countries - Britain, Germany, Austria, and Sweden, the author posits a continuum of political vulnerability that predicts how different combinations of institutions should affect a political system's ability to resist interest group pressure. Num Pages: 224 pages. BIC Classification: 1DBK; 1DFA; 1DFG; 1DNS; JPH; JPWD. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 234 x 162 x 13. Weight in Grams: 310. . 2012. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Kartoniert / Broschiert. Condition: New. &Uumlber den AutorLorelei Moosbrugger is an assistant professor of political science at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Neuware - Where politics is dominated by two large parties, as in the United States, politicians should be relatively immune to the influence of small groups. Yet narrow interest groups often win private benefits against majority preferences and at great public expense. Why The 'vulnerability thesis' is that the electoral system is largely to blame, making politicians in two-party systems more vulnerable to interest group demands than politicians in multiparty systems. Political scientist Lorelei Moosbrugger ranks democracies on a continuum of political vulnerability and tests the thesis by examining agrochemical policy in Austria, Britain, Germany, Sweden, and the European Union.

Condition: Hervorragend. Zustand: Hervorragend | Sprache: Englisch | Produktart: Bücher | Keine Beschreibung verfügbar.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condition: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000.

Condition: New. This item is printed on demand. New copy - Usually dispatched within 5-9 working days.

Paperback. Condition: new. Paperback. Where politics is dominated by two large parties, as in the United States, politicians should be relatively immune to the influence of small groups. Yet narrow interest groups often win private benefits against majority preferences and at great public expense. Why? The "vulnerability thesis" is that the electoral system is largely to blame, making politicians in two-party systems more vulnerable to interest group demands than politicians in multiparty systems. Political scientist Lorelei Moosbrugger ranks democracies on a continuum of political vulnerability and tests the thesis by examining agrochemical policy in Austria, Britain, Germany, Sweden, and the European Union. Using the example of the agrochemical industry in four countries - Britain, Germany, Austria, and Sweden, the author posits a continuum of political vulnerability that predicts how different combinations of institutions should affect a political system's ability to resist interest group pressure. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.